Preview of my next book

I am currently in the process of writing my second book. My goal is to make a reference guide to every named, and notable unnamed, woman in the Bible (just the 66 books of the Protestant Bible). I am aware that there are other books out there with similar information, however I am hoping to offer this one as a more affordable ($2.99 for e-book and Kindle) and user friendly version. The e-book version will have hyperlinks to the Bible verses as well as alternative spellings.

 I am looking for feedback to see if this is something that would be useful or if there is more information you would like to see. Below are a few entries to sample. Please post your comments. I read and value all of them.

 Also, you can find my first book, “7 Common Mistakes That Christians Make and How to Avoid them” on Amazon.

Paperback version (click here)
Kindle version (click here)

Here are the sample entries:

Anna (Ἄννα) “gracious; one who gives”

Parents: Phanuel (father)
Husband: Unnamed
Siblings: Unknown
Children: Unknown
Story: Anna was a prophetess that worshipped in the temple for 77 years after her husband of seven years died. We are told that she never left the temple and worshipped by fasting and praying each day. When Jesus’ parents presented him at the temple, Anna saw the Christ child and gave thanks to God, and began to talk to everyone about him.
Alternative spellings: None
Luke 2:36

Azubah (עזוּבה) “forsaken”

Parents: Unknown
Husband: Caleb
Siblings: Unknown
Children: If she is the same woman as Jerioth (see alternate spellings below) then she would have been mother to Jesher, Shobab, and Ardon.
Story: Unknown
Alternative spellings: Other scholars have identified Jerioth as being the same woman as Azubah, while still others believe Jerioth was Azubah’s mother. The NSRV, KJV, ESV, and NIV bibles all consider these to be two separate women.
1 Chronicles 2:18-19

Candace (Κανδάκη) “who possesses contrition”

Parents: Unknown
Husband: Unknown
Siblings: Unknown
Children: Unknown
Story: All we know from scripture about her is her name. Her court official, an unnamed eunuch who was in charge of her treasury, was met by Philip on his way back from Jerusalem and baptized. Nothing further is known about him.
Alternative spellings: None
Acts 8:27

What are Traditional Family Values?

     We hear a lot today from the media or from the pulpits about the so-called war on traditional families and the destruction of traditional family values. This is usually associated with the undefined political liberals and the ongoing issue of gay marriage, or the equally undefined “homosexual agenda.” What we do not hear so much, or at least I don’t, is, what exactly are family values, traditional or otherwise? For that matter, how do we, as a culture or society, accurately define “family”?     If you’re like me, you grew up in a traditional family setting. We had two parents, siblings, grandparents, aunts, uncles, cousins, and so on. There were annual family reunions (one for each of my parents) where we met with distant relatives that we only saw once a year or less, but what about those who were not so lucky, by my standards at least, to have had the blessing of growing up in such a traditional fashion? In other words, what standard or model do we use to define what family is?
     I had friends that came from severely broken homes. Divorced parents, siblings split between parents, custody given to a grandparent or distant relative, etc. Would these people be willing to admit that they did not have a family, or would they just define it differently than I did? There are also people without the benefit of blood relations that would have quite a different definition of family too. For them, it may be a close network of friends. I, for one, have a friend of many years that I consider as much family as I do my own siblings. Many of our elderly live in retirement or assisted living facilities where family is defined as those with whom they live with and rely on daily.
     Still, many hold fast to the idea that the ideal family is constructed of two adults of different sexes that have one or more children between them. Does that mean that couples who are unable, or choose not, to have children are not families? How about couples who are living together without the legality of marriage, either with or without children? Is marriage required to define family? As we can see, the definition of family, traditional or otherwise, is as varied as there are individuals who define it. Likewise, “tradition” is equally hard to pin down. Therefore, I would conclude that “family” cannot be defined by its physical construction since it is built differently for each of us, and yet still remains “family” for each of us.
     So, what is the unifying thread that runs through families that causes us to call them that? Is it family values? Again, I find “family values” equally hard to apply to “family.” How do we define something as intangible and subjective as a value? While we value our family members, they are not, in of themselves, a value. Maybe value is not the right word. May we, perhaps, use the term “quality” instead? Now we have something we can work with. What qualities do our families possess that we place value on? I would suggest things like; mutual love and respect, acceptance (in spite of differences), or comfort, as in offering a safe place to be, be from, or return to. They likewise offer us a place to turn to for acceptance, sympathy, empathy, and affirmation. This is not to say that all families are of like mind or are in total agreement. We all know that’s not true, but we also know that the differences do not outweigh the qualities that we deem so valuable.
     I believe, now, we can safely say that both “family” and “family values” can be defined in such a way as to apply those definitions in a universal fashion. We can define family as two or more people who are in agreement on the fact that every member of the group is considered a member of their family. Family values, then, are the aforementioned qualities that the individual groups possess that the members value.
     Which brings me back to my original question, what is it about gay marriage or the homosexual relationship that is claimed by so many to devalue or break down family values? Perhaps it is the inclusion of the word “traditional” that causes the problem. This is an obvious argument fallacy since traditions vary and cannot be applied universally. It is my belief that when people say “traditional” they really mean “Christian” family values, which is to say that only Christians are capable of possessing qualities such as love, respect, acceptance, and so on. This is a false assumption. These qualities can be found in families of all faiths as well as in families of no faith at all.
     For the sake of argument, let us turn to the Bible and see what, if anything, Jesus had to say on the subject of family. We know that Jesus was raised by two parents and that he had siblings. However, Joseph was not his biological father and his siblings were only half siblings, so there goes any notion that traditional Christian families must have complete biological connections. Likewise, Jesus was (probably) not married and (also probably) had no children, which throws the notion that marriage and children are necessary in a traditional Christian family right out the window. There is, however, one passage of scripture where Jesus does address the concept of family. It can be found in Mark’s gospel (how convenient for me), chapter 3, and verses 31-35. When Jesus’ mother and brothers come to get him from the crowds, Jesus was told that they were looking for him. His reply was this, “Who are my mother and my brothers?” And looking at those who were sitting around him in a circle, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers! For whoever does the will of God is my brother and sister and mother.”
     So, for those who wish to apply Christianity to family and family values, it might do you well to first understand what Christianity has to say about it.

As always, your comments are welcome and encouraged.

The Blame Game

Today I was reviewing an old sermon that I delivered some years ago. I found the video on my YouTube channel (which I rarely visit) and realized that I had forgotten what the sermon was about, so I watched it. I am almost always fascinated by the fact that I like my sermons after a few years have passed more than the day I preach them. This particular text was from the gospel of John, 9:1-41. This scripture recounts a time when Jesus and his disciples come across a man blind from birth who sat in the middle of town begging for a living. The disciples ask Jesus the following question, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents?” Jesus bypasses the question and proceeds to heal the man by making clay out of dirt and his spit, putting it on the man’s eyes, and telling him to wash. After which the man is healed. Later, the man is taken to the authorities to determine if Jesus was acting from God’s power or not.
What struck me was the relevance to today’s society. Here we find a man who, by no fault of his own, was born blind, and because of his disability, was reduced to begging for a living. When the disciples see him, they do not try to help, but instead try to find fault for his situation. In other words, they are trying to transfer responsibility from themselves to either the man or someone else. Aren’t we doing that to our own downtrodden today? Are we not passing blame back and forth between parties other than ourselves? The republicans blame the democrats and vice versa, the president blames the congress and vice versa, Wall Street blames the OWSers and vice versa, yet no one claims responsibility.
Back to the scripture. The man that has just been healed is taken to the authorities to determine, not if he has been healed, but if the healing was LEGAL. Give me a break. The Pharisees completely ignore the miracle and go into debate over whether or not Jesus broke the law. Really? Someone does a deed of kindness and they are questioned as to whether or not that deed was within the law. Sound familiar?
Maybe we should stop looking for blame, passing responsibility, and checking the letter of the law, and just DO THE RIGHT THING!
Sorry for the rant, but I found it necessary to get it off my chest.
Peace

The Power of Lent

I was going through some old sermons I had on file and ran across this one I wrote for Ash Wednesday some years ago. Since we are in the season, I thought it a good ideal to share again. Your comments are welcome.

Lent is a time in the Christian year that is, at best, misunderstood and at worst, ignored. Traditionally, Lent was a time of repentance spent in preparation for new believers to be baptized into the family of Christ. Over time, the importance of the season and the disciplines associated with it has been reduced to the point that we barely pay it lip service and rarely, if ever, participate.
Jesus did not begin his ministry on a whim. He prepared himself fully before he started his ministry; mentally, ritually and spiritually. Jesus prepared himself mentally through years of studying the scriptures, which armed him with full working knowledge of both Mosaic Law and the prophets, because he knew that he would come up against criticism from learned priests, scribes and Pharisees, and he knew he would have to defend himself as well as prove himself scripturally to anyone that questioned him.
Jesus prepared himself ritually through the public act of baptism after which he received his ordination from God proclaiming him to be God’s son, the Messiah, the savior who would free mankind from sin and death.
The third phase of Jesus’ preparation for ministry was his spiritual formation. The gospel of Mark tells us that immediately after his baptism he went out into the wilderness to fast, pray and meditate. It is this third and final phase of preparation that we honor and emulate during the season of Lent and it deserves close attention, if for no other reason than because it is a discipline ordained by Christ; a sacrament, if you will, just as important as Holy Communion or baptism.
Spiritual enlightenment and fulfillment begins with the practice of fasting. This is an act of self-denial and purging of the trappings, temptations and distractions of our lives with the purpose of allowing more room in our lives for the Holy Spirit to come in to. The more we give up of worldly distractions, the more aware of, and attentive to, the workings of the spirit we can become. And it follows naturally that the more we allow the Holy Spirit into our lives, the better prepared we will be to address spiritual challenges.
The second discipline of Lent is that of prayer. Through prayer we enter into a communication with our Lord. This is a time for repentance and humility. It is a time whereby we can freely speak to our maker about our own shortcomings and misgivings. It is a time to ask questions, and yes, a time to be still and quiet so that we may hear the answers also.
Finally, there is the act of meditation where we then reflect and discern what we have learned through our prayers, with the help of the Holy Spirit. Only after diligently following these three disciplines are we fully prepared to resist the evils and temptations of this world.
The scriptures are clear as to the necessity for being spiritually prepared in this manner. After Jesus had been in the wilderness, fasting, praying and meditating for 40 days we are told that the devil came to tempt him. This was a grave error in judgment on the part of Satan. Satan assumed, wrongly, that in his physically weakened human state, Jesus would be most vulnerable to human temptation. He could not have been more mistaken. Not being human himself, but spirit, Satan could only be defeated by spiritual strength, and although weakened and famished physically, Jesus was spiritually at his strongest and able to easily resist. That is the power of Lent!
We must then ask ourselves when, where, and under what circumstances, does Satan come to tempt us? When and where and under what circumstances are we most vulnerable? How prepared are we to resist him and the evils of this world that surround us every day? If we cannot answer an emphatic yes to that last question then we must ask, what are we going to do about it?
The season of Lent is not something to be ignored, watered down or rewritten for our own convenience through false justifications. Lent is to be looked forward to and embraced, joyfully, with anticipation and expectation. Lent is a season of empowerment. If we study the word, accept Christ as our savior through baptism and allow the Holy Spirit to come in and fill our minds, our bodies, and our very souls, then, then can we be fully prepared disciples of Jesus Christ!

The Legend of Philip and the Eunuch: A Sermon

Originally written as an assignment for Campbell. It received such high praise from the professor I thought I’d share.

Acts 8:4-8; 26-40 (NRSV)

I would like to look at our scripture reading today as a story. As in all stories, there is first and foremost a teller of the story followed by a number of characters of greater or lesser parts. There is a setting, or stage, where the story takes place and at least some description of the surrounding area, or props if you will. Finally, there is the purpose of the story; that is, what point our storyteller is trying to get across to us.
Let’s start with our cast of characters. Our main character is Philip, and he is the only one actually named in the story. Philip is a disciple of Jesus of which we know little of. He is not one of the three favorites (Peter, James and John) nor did he have a gospel named after him (Matthew and John). We first meet him in the John’s gospel when Jesus finds Philip in Galilee and asks Philip to follow him. We are told that he was from Bethsaida, the city where Peter and Andrew were from and we are also told that Philip found Nathanael and told him that the Messiah had been found in the person of Jesus. John also makes it clear that Philip did not hesitate to follow Jesus, unlike his friend Nathanael.
Philip next appears with Jesus and disciples prior to the feeding of the 5000. Jesus asks Philip about buying bread for the crowd and Philip answers him that there is no way they had enough money to buy bread for a crowd that size. Next, Philip appears in John’s gospel after Jesus’ entry into Jerusalem when two Greeks approach him to ask to see Jesus. Philip then gets his friend Andrew and together they ask Jesus for these men to speak to him. As we can see, Philip does not play much of a talked about role during the ministry of Jesus and we don’t see him again until this passage from Acts.
Our next character in our story today is an unnamed eunuch on his way home from Jerusalem. We are told a few things about this man. First, he is a Jew. We know this because we are told that he has been to the temple in Jerusalem to worship and he is reading a scroll of Isaiah. Apparently this man was of high standing for we also know that he was in charge of the entire treasury of Queen Candace of Ethiopia, which would have made him also very trustworthy. What else can we discern about this man? I would venture to guess that he was humble. He is approached by a stranger, Philip, admits that he doesn’t fully understand what he is reading, and then invites this stranger into his chariot with an open and questioning mind to hear what Philip has to say.
Minor characters in our story include an unnamed angel, the Holy Spirit, and a crowd of Samaritans whom we are told listened to Philip with one accord. There is, however, one more very important character here. Any professor of literature will tell you that the narrator of any story is also a character in the story. In this case we have the writer of both the gospel of Luke and the book of Acts (originally written as one document) whom we will call Luke out of convenience even though we do not know for sure who actually wrote it. Luke is the most important person in the story because he is the one that reveals to us exactly what he wants us to see and hear. He knows ahead of time what is going to be said by the other characters and how they will respond. Our story teller is not recording history here, he is giving instruction. He is an evangelist with an agenda.
So, you may be asking yourselves why I say that this is story, not history. Do I believe that this did not actually happen and that Luke just made it up? Not necessarily. But, I do believe that Luke embellished the story for his own purposes. Let me explain what I mean. First, and most importantly, our two main characters, Philip and the eunuch, are behaving very out of character as we might expect knowing what we know about them already. Based on prior knowledge about Philip, we might conclude that he was not a very assertive individual. He follows Jesus without question, unlike his friend Nathanael. He has little to no faith in Jesus’ ability to feed the masses in spite of having seen miracle after miracle performed by Jesus. And, he is apparently too timid to approach Jesus with the request of the Greeks without first getting support from Andrew. Does this sound like the same man who could preach to great crowds in Samaria of all places? Does this sound like someone that would approach a high official of the queen in his chariot?
Likewise so is our eunuch. Here is a man of high social standing, probably educated, with servants at his command. Are we to believe that he would allow a stranger of lower rank to get that close to his chariot, much less invite him in, not to mention asking him to baptize him? No, in my mind all of these things sound very unlikely. But that is not the point. Perhaps something similar did occur, but that in retelling it exactly the way it happened served no purpose or was so boring that no one would bother reading it twice, much less remember it and reflect on it later. Enter the story teller. Now we have an event worth noting.
For many of us, at least for myself, when we read a story, be it fiction, history, the Bible, or any other work that includes characters, we are invited by the author to put ourselves into the minds and places of the characters we are reading about. If a character is thinking something, we are told what they are thinking. If they are feeling something, again the author tells us what that feeling is so that we can share in it with them. This is what good story telling is about. And, often times, if the author is very good, we learn a little something about ourselves by experiencing others, even if for a short moment.
So, with that in mine, let us immerse ourselves into the story and live out the plot from “within” the characters minds. Let us imagine that it is we ourselves reciting the lines, viewing the scenery, acting according to the script. How well can we relate to what is being said and done? Are we like Philip? Are we usually pretty timid when it comes to our faith in Jesus; following the same routine without question, not asking hard questions, reading about miracles without actually believing that those kinds of things actually happen anymore, just in Bible stories, never really approaching Jesus on our own without first relying on someone else to go with us? Do we believe in angels? Do we listen to the direction of the Holy Spirit? Do we step out of our comfort zone or social class to tell someone the good news about Jesus? How does it make us feel when we read about that person (ourselves) in this story turning into the great hero Christian? Through the story we get to feel what it is like to take action and fulfill our duty as missionaries for Christ. We get to teach the scripture, win a new soul for Christ, and be protected by the Spirit. Feels good, doesn’t it?
Are we like the eunuch? Are we successful and educated, secure in our position within society? Do we wear a badge of importance and hold a high income job? Do we show our faith in the same way, going to church in a big fancy car with an entourage of underlings? Do we avoid associating with those of lower class than ourselves for fear of how we would be viewed by our peers? Do we read the Bible and claim to understand it when in fact we are just too proud to admit we don’t? Perhaps we have never let Jesus in our lives because we never allowed anyone to get close enough to us to share him with us. How does it feel now from this perspective to read about this hero eunuch? Here’s a man we can relate to that allowed himself to be open to a stranger of lower class without fear of social rejection. Here is a man that is willing to admit that he doesn’t know everything in spite of his position and education. Here is a man that could humble himself to step out of his comfort zone and admit that he needs Jesus and be baptized. Feels good, doesn’t it?
We need story tellers like Luke. We need people to give us a glimpse of how things could be if we just let it happen. Is the story true or fiction; historically accurate or highly embellished? I don’t know and I don’t think it matters. I think what does matter is that it serves the purpose of the evangelist well and gives us a chance to give pause and reflect on our own lives. No matter how we view our real-world lives, either boring and unremarkable or important but lacking, perhaps this little story should give us hope; hope that with the help of the Holy Spirit we too can be heroes for Christ and tell others our story.
Amen

My newest project

Well, it’s been awhile. Years in fact since I began my academic journey (and no foreseeable end in sight I might add). My original goal of obtaining a four year degree so that I could qualify to work for the church was all I had expected to achieve. What I hadn’t counted on was an unshakable addiction to knowledge and the learning process. I am reminded of one of my favorite quotes from the movie, Oh Brother Where Art Thou which I will paraphrase here by saying that my degree in religious studies has only aroused my appetite without properly bedding it down. My first semester in divinity school likewise did little to satisfy me and much to increase my addiction.

I now find myself in the very uncomfortable position of having to take off from formal studies while I take care of my Aspersers son. Here I sit with all the training and tools to pursue and further my career in biblical studies and not a classroom or professor to guide me. So, I have decided to self-study and in the process (hopefully) I can improve my knowledge and perhaps help others with similar addictions. I have begun to write a book. Oh, not just any book, but a reference book. (Non-academics would call it dry and boring, serious egghead scholars would call it mind candy).

My wife told me I should pick a narrow subject and make it an assignment. As an advocate for the underdogs in life and the overlooked and underwhelmed members of society, I began to look at some of the lesser known figures in the scriptures where I finally landed on a fascinating creature that is rarely discussed; woman. Therefore, I am currently compiling a list of all the women in the Bible and will hopefully soon be making it available to the public in book form.

I would appreciate and encourage any thoughts or input any of you may have on the subject. What would you like to know? What kind of reference would be helpful to you? Which women in the Bible are your favorites or would like to know more about? Feedback on these or any other thoughts are welcome and helpful.

During this process I will be blogging on my progress and on some of the more interesting women I run across in my research. Please visit often and leave you comments.